section 574(1.2)

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

Allows prosecutors to combine charges from two subsections into a single indictment.

SECTION WORDING

574(1.2) If indictments may be preferred under both subsections (1) and (1.1), the prosecutor may prefer a single indictment in respect of one or more charges referred to in subsection (1) combined with one or more charges or included charges referred to in subsection (1.1).

EXPLANATION

Section 574(1.2) of the Criminal Code of Canada allows a prosecutor to combine charges laid under different subsections of section 574, namely (1) and (1.1), into a single indictment. The reason for this provision is to streamline the criminal justice process by reducing the number of trials and hearings required to address multiple charges against a single individual. Subsection (1) of section 574 pertains to the offence of conspiracy, or an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act. Under subsection (1), a person can be charged with both conspiracy and the actual commission of the offence that was the subject of the conspiracy. Subsection (1.1) pertains to the offence of participation in activities of a criminal organization, or being associated with a group that engages in organized crime. Under subsection (1.1), a person can be charged with both participation in a criminal organization and any other offence related to the activities of the organization. Section 574(1.2) allows a prosecutor to charge an individual under both subsections of section 574 if the circumstances of the case warrant it. For example, if an individual is charged with both conspiracy and participation in a criminal organization related to the same unlawful act, then the prosecutor may choose to combine those charges into a single indictment. This can reduce the burden on courts and streamline the criminal justice process. However, it is important to note that the prosecutor must still prove each charge beyond a reasonable doubt, even if they are combined in a single indictment. Additionally, the accused has the right to a fair trial and the option to challenge the indictment and each individual charge laid against them.

COMMENTARY

Section 574(1.2) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides the prosecutor with the discretion to prefer a single indictment in cases where charges can be brought under both subsections (1) and (1.1). This provision applies primarily to cases where an accused is charged with both a summary conviction offence and an indictable offence, or where an accused is charged with multiple indictable offences that are closely related. The provision provides the prosecutor with the ability to streamline the charging process, avoid duplicative proceedings, and reduce the time and resources required to prosecute the accused. It also allows the court to efficiently conduct a trial and impose a sentence that reflects the gravity of the offences committed. Additionally, this provision reduces the risk of inconsistent verdicts and sentences being imposed if an accused were to face separate trials for each offence. This can lead to a better overall outcome for all parties involved as the accused can receive a more appropriate sentence without the risk of facing multiple trials. However, there are also criticisms of this provision. Some argue that it can be abused by prosecutors who use it as a tool to pressure accused persons into pleading guilty to offences that they may not have otherwise admitted to. Additionally, a single indictment with multiple charges can lead to a more complicated and convoluted trial process, which may be confusing for both the court and the jury. Overall, section 574(1.2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an important provision that provides the prosecutor with the flexibility to choose the most appropriate method of charging based on the circumstances of the case. This provision can lead to a more efficient and effective process, but it must be used with caution to avoid any potential abuses.

STRATEGY

Section 574(1.2) of the Criminal Code of Canada allows a prosecutor to prefer a single indictment for two or more charges under subsections (1) and (1.1). This section provides several strategic considerations to the prosecuting counsel, which involve various factors such as the complexity of the case, the availability of resources, and the strength of the evidence. One strategic consideration is the number of charges to be preferred in one indictment. Multiple charges may increase the burden of proof, whereas lesser charges may secure a conviction and still result in a substantial sentence. In fact, an indictment with fewer charges may also provide clarity to the judge and jury, thus reducing the complexity of the case. Another strategic consideration is the relationship between the charges to be combined under subsection (1.2). The charges must have some degree of similarity or connection, such as committing the same offense multiple times or committing different offenses in furtherance of a single criminal scheme. The prosecutor must ensure that the combined charges do not result in prejudicing the accused in any way, such as presenting evidence that is irrelevant or has a cumulative effect. A third strategic consideration is the availability of resources. Combining charges under subsection (1.2) may save the prosecution time and resources since they would not have to prepare and present separate cases for each offense. However, this may also result in a longer trial with complex issues that would require additional resources, including expert witnesses and evidence. Furthermore, the strength of the evidence also plays a vital role in the strategic considerations of the prosecution when dealing with this section. If the evidence for all offenses is strong, then the prosecutor may prefer a single indictment and present the evidence collectively. However, if the evidence for each charge varies in strength, then the prosecution may prefer separate indictments for each offense to avoid losing a conviction for a weaker charge. In conclusion, there are several strategic considerations a prosecutor must keep in mind when dealing with Section 574(1.2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The prosecutor must evaluate the number and relationship between the charges, the availability of resources, and the strength of the evidence to decide whether to combine the charges or prefer separate indictments. By doing so, the prosecutor can present a clear and concise case to the court, ensuring the best possible outcome for the justice system and the public.