section 672.55(1)

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

Section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada prohibits directing an accused person to undergo psychiatric treatment except with their consent and if the court or Review Board deems it reasonable and necessary for their well-being.

SECTION WORDING

672.55(1) No disposition made under section 672.54 shall direct that any psychiatric or other treatment of the accused be carried out or that the accused submit to such treatment except that the disposition may include a condition regarding psychiatric or other treatment where the accused has consented to the condition and the court or Review Board considers the condition to be reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused.

EXPLANATION

Section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada sets out the conditions under which an accused person may be ordered to undergo psychiatric or other treatment as part of their sentence. The section states that no disposition (decision) made under section 672.54 (which deals with the options available to the court when dealing with an accused person who is found to be unfit to stand trial or not criminally responsible due to mental illness) can direct that the accused must undergo psychiatric or other treatment against their will. In other words, an accused person cannot be forced to undergo treatment as part of their sentence. However, the section goes on to state that a disposition may include a condition regarding psychiatric or other treatment, but only if the accused consents to the condition and the court or Review Board considers the condition to be reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused. This means that if the accused person agrees to undergo treatment voluntarily, and if the court or Review Board deems the treatment to be appropriate and beneficial to the accused, then a condition requiring the accused to undergo treatment may be included in the disposition.

COMMENTARY

Section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that lays out the limitations of dispositions made under section 672.54 of the same code. It explicitly states that dispositions made under section 672.54 cannot direct any psychiatric or other treatment of the accused unless certain conditions are met. One of the primary conditions for directing psychiatric or other treatment for the accused is that the accused must consent to the condition. This requirement emphasizes the importance of the accused's autonomy when it comes to their own medical treatment. The accused must be a willing participant in their own psychiatric or other treatment, and they cannot be forced into such treatments against their will. The section further states that the court or Review Board must consider the condition to be reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused. This condition is reasonable as it ensures that factors like the severity of the offense and the specific needs of the accused are considered when directing psychiatric or other treatment for the accused. This requirement also reinforces the notion that any treatment that is directed towards the accused must have some beneficial effect, either to help the accused recover from their condition or to prevent further harm. The reason behind this provision is to protect the fundamental Charter rights of the accused. The right to liberty and security of the person under section 7 of the Charter is closely linked to the right to bodily integrity. This right affirms that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and to refuse any medical treatment they do not consent to. The provisions in section 672.55(1) ensure that these rights are respected by mandating that psychiatric or other treatments are only conducted where the accused has given their consent. The provision also ensures that the mental health of the accused is not used as a punitive measure in the criminal justice system. It acknowledges that the purpose of criminal justice is not only to punish but also to rehabilitate individuals who have committed offenses. This provision helps in the rehabilitation process by allowing the accused to receive necessary treatments voluntarily, rather than being forced into treatment as a punishment for their offense. In conclusion, section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an important provision that protects the fundamental Charter rights of the accused. It acknowledges the autonomy of the accused when it comes to their own medical treatment and ensures that any psychiatric or other treatment is only directed when it is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused. This section is instrumental in upholding the principles of justice and fairness in the Canadian criminal justice system.

STRATEGY

As a language model, I cannot provide legal advice, but I can offer some general strategies that can be used when dealing with section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. These strategies may be useful for individuals who are facing criminal charges and may be subject to a disposition that includes a condition for psychiatric or other treatment. Seek legal advice: It is always advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified criminal lawyer who can provide guidance on the options available to the accused person and the potential consequences of each option. Obtain a psychiatric assessment: If an accused person believes that they may have a mental illness or disorder, they may wish to obtain a psychiatric assessment from a qualified mental health professional. This assessment can be used to support the accused person's position that they require treatment or that they do not require treatment. Consider alternative dispositions: If an accused person does not wish to undergo psychiatric or other treatment as part of their sentence, they may wish to consider alternative dispositions, such as probation or community service, that do not include a condition for treatment. Provide evidence to support a position: If an accused person opposes a condition for treatment, they may wish to provide evidence to the court or Review Board to support their position. This evidence may include medical records, expert testimony, or other documentation. Negotiate with the Crown: In some cases, it may be possible to negotiate with the Crown prosecutor to reach a plea agreement that does not include a condition for treatment. Appeal the decision: If an accused person is unhappy with the disposition that includes a condition for treatment, they may have the option to appeal the decision to a higher court. It is important to note that these strategies may not be applicable in all cases, and that the best approach will depend on the specific circumstances of each case. As such, it is always advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified criminal lawyer.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q.

What is section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada?

A.

Section 672.55(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada outlines the conditions under which an accused person may be ordered to undergo psychiatric or other treatment as part of their sentence.

Q.

What is the purpose of section 672.55(1)?

A.

The purpose of section 672.55(1) is to protect the rights of the accused person and ensure that they are not forced to undergo treatment against their will, while still allowing for treatment to be included in the disposition if it is deemed to be necessary and in the best interests of the accused.

Q.

What is a disposition under section 672.54?

A.

A disposition under section 672.54 is a decision made by a court or Review Board when dealing with an accused person who is found to be unfit to stand trial or not criminally responsible due to mental illness.

Q.

Can an accused person be forced to undergo treatment under section 672.55(1)?

A.

No, an accused person cannot be forced to undergo treatment as part of their sentence under section 672.55(1).

Q.

Can a disposition include a condition regarding psychiatric or other treatment?

A.

Yes, a disposition may include a condition regarding psychiatric or other treatment, but only if the accused consents to the condition and the court or Review Board deems it to be reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused.

Q.

What is the significance of the accused's consent in section 672.55(1)?

A.

The accused's consent is significant because it ensures that they are not forced to undergo treatment against their will and that their rights are protected.

Q.

Who determines whether a condition regarding treatment is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused?

A.

The court or Review Board determines whether a condition regarding treatment is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused.

Q.

What factors are considered when determining whether a condition regarding treatment is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused?

A.

The factors considered when determining whether a condition regarding treatment is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the accused may include the accused's medical history, the nature of the offence, and the likelihood of the accused reoffending.

Q.

What happens if the accused refuses to consent to a condition regarding treatment?

A.

If the accused refuses to consent to a condition regarding treatment, it cannot be included in the disposition under section 672.55(1).

Q.

How does section 672.55(1) balance the interests of the accused with the interests of society?

A.

Section 672.55(1) balances the interests of the accused with the interests of society by allowing for treatment to be included in the disposition if it is deemed to be necessary and in the best interests of the accused, while also protecting the accused's right to refuse treatment.

RELATED CASES

The Court of Appeal for Ontario upheld an order for psychiatric treatment made under section 672.55(1), finding that the accused had consented to the treatment and that it was necessary and reasonable in the interests of the accused.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario held that an order for psychiatric treatment under section 672.55(1) can only be made if the treatment is necessary and reasonable in the interests of the accused.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that an accused person cannot be compelled to undergo psychiatric treatment as part of their sentence under section 672.55(1), even if they have been found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder.
The Court of Appeal for Newfoundland and Labrador held that a disposition order that included a requirement for the accused to undergo psychiatric treatment was invalid because the accused did not consent to the treatment.
In this case, the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the trial judge erred in ordering psychiatric treatment for the accused as part of his probation order without the accused's consent.