INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

The definition of the term prosecutor as contained in the Criminal Code of Canada.

SECTION WORDING

2. In this Act, "prosecutor" means the Attorney General or, where the Attorney General does not intervene, means the person who institutes proceedings to which this Act applies, and includes counsel acting on behalf of either of them;

EXPLANATION

Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines the meaning of prosecutor" in the Act. The definition includes the Attorney General and any other person who institutes proceedings to which the Act applies. This definition is significant because the prosecution plays a crucial role in the criminal justice system. The Attorney General is responsible for the administration of justice in Canada, and this includes directing the prosecution of criminal offences. In many cases, the Attorney General will delegate this responsibility to the Crown Attorney or other counsel, who will then serve as the prosecutor in the case. It is important to note that the prosecutor's role is not simply to secure convictions. Rather, the prosecutor has a duty to ensure that justice is served in each case. This means that the prosecutor must act fairly and impartially, disclose all relevant evidence to the defence, and present the case honestly and accurately in court. In cases where the Attorney General does not intervene, the person who institutes proceedings (usually a police officer or other law enforcement official) will act as the prosecutor. This individual may also delegate the role to another counsel, who will then act on their behalf. Overall, the definition of prosecutor" in section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada is significant because it highlights the importance of the prosecution in the criminal justice system. It also emphasizes the need for fairness, impartiality, and transparency in the prosecution of criminal offences.

COMMENTARY

Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines the term prosecutor and specifies its meaning as used in the Act. It states that a prosecutor is either the Attorney General or the person who initiates proceedings recognized under the Criminal Code. This section also includes lawyers who act on behalf of either of them as part of the definition of the prosecutor. By defining the term, Section 2 helps in the interpretation and application of the Criminal Code, wherein all related proceedings are conducted in compliance with Canadian justice system requirements. The designation as prosecutor is essential in criminal proceedings as it entails significant responsibilities. The prosecutor's role is to assess the evidence, apply the law, and determine whether the evidence and the law support the charges being laid against the accused. Section 2 clarifies that the specific prosecutor may be the Attorney General, or another person who brings charges to which the Criminal Code applies. An example of this is when a private citizen files a complaint against a person for alleged criminal activity; in such a scenario, the person who filed the complaint becomes the prosecutor. In the Canadian justice system, the prosecutor plays a crucial role in criminal proceedings. The prosecutor determines whether there is enough evidence and if it is in line with the Criminal Code to move the case forward. Thus, the prosecutor's role carries significant legal and ethical obligations to ensure the highest standard of fairness, impartiality, and adherence to the law. Also, the prosecutor is tasked with presenting the evidence and the case in court with integrity, transparency, and professionalism. The prosecutor's actions must be guided by the legal principle that any accused person is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, Section 2 recognizes that in instances where the Attorney General fails to intervene, or the prosecutor is not the Attorney General, the person taking up the prosecutor's role fulfills the Attorney General's statutory duty. The Attorney General is the chief legal officer in Canada and is responsible for upholding the rule of law and ensuring the administration of justice. The Attorney General retains control over prosecutions across the country, and the prosecutor's role involves prosecuting cases on behalf of the Attorney General. This provision emphasizes the importance of ensuring accountability in the administration of justice, even beyond the office of the Attorney General. In conclusion, Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines the term prosecutor and outlines the definition's elements. This definition helps to clarify the role of the prosecutor in Canadian criminal proceedings and highlights the person's duties and responsibilities. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of ensuring accountability in the administration of justice while upholding the rule of law and guaranteeing the rights of all parties involved. As such, Section 2 is a critical element of the Criminal Code of Canada, which supports the rule of law in the country and promotes fairness in all criminal proceedings.

STRATEGY

Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada is crucial in shaping criminal proceedings as it delineates the roles of the prosecutor and the Attorney General. As such, legal practitioners must be conversant with this section and its implications for strategic considerations in criminal cases. This brief paper examines some strategic considerations when dealing with Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada and proposes some strategies that could be employed. One strategic consideration is understanding the difference between the role of the prosecutor and that of the Attorney General. This distinction is important because it helps defense counsel understand who they are dealing with in a case. The Attorney General is the government's legal advisor, responsible for shaping legal policy, interpreting laws, and supervising crown attorneys. The prosecutor, on the other hand, is appointed by the Attorney General and is responsible for prosecuting criminal offenses in court. The prosecutor may be a Crown Attorney, an Attorney General-appointed outside counsel, or a private prosecutor. Therefore, a strategic consideration would be to identify who is prosecuting the case. Another strategic consideration is determining the scope of the prosecution's authority. Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada authorizes the Attorney General or the prosecutor to institute proceedings to which this Act applies. However, the Attorney General can take over the prosecution of a case at any time, and such a decision may impact the strategy of the defense. For instance, if the Attorney General takes over the prosecution, this may signal that the prosecution's case is strong, and the defense may need to reassess its approach. Strategies that could be employed in dealing with Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada include understanding the political climate surrounding the case. The Attorney General is a political appointee, and the government of the day may influence the decisions they make in prosecuting a case. Therefore, a strategic consideration would be to understand the political environment and adjust the defense's strategy accordingly. This may include seeking media coverage, leveraging public opinion, or seeking to influence the political process. Another strategy would be to challenge the prosecution's authority to institute proceedings. In some cases, the Attorney General may not have the authority to prosecute a case or may have acted outside their legal mandate. This could include instances where charges have been filed maliciously, without merit, or where there is an abuse of the legal process. In such scenarios, defense counsel may challenge the prosecution's authority to institute proceedings, which may result in the case being dismissed. In conclusion, Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada is crucial in shaping criminal proceedings. Successful defense of criminal charges requires understanding the role of the prosecutor and the Attorney General and how they operate within the legal system. Strategic considerations could include understanding the scope of the prosecution's authority, the political climate, and challenging the prosecution's authority. Deploying such strategies may result in a more favorable outcome for the defense.

RELATED SECTIONS