section 2


The definition of the term territorial division as it is used in the Criminal Code of Canada.


2. In this Act, "territorial division" includes any province, county, union of counties, township, city, town, parish or other judicial division or place to which the context applies;


Generally, a matter is to be prosecuted in the territorial division in which the criminal act occurred. In some cases, the Criminal Code allows the Crown to usurp jurisdiction that may not otherwise be apparent. Notable examples are jurisdiction for acts committed on a ship or aircraft, as denoted in section 476.


Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada describes the meaning of the term "territorial division" within the context of the Act. This term refers to any geographical division that has the authority to enforce the law. The definition of the term includes a variety of divisions ranging from provinces and counties to cities and towns. This section plays a crucial role in the interpretation of the Criminal Code of Canada as it ensures clarity and consistency in the application of the law. It provides a comprehensive definition of the various territorial divisions that are included within the Act. This means that there is no ambiguity in understanding which geographical areas are covered by the Act. The inclusion of a wide range of territorial divisions within this section ensures that all parts of the country are covered under the Act. This is important for ensuring equality before the law and ensuring that individuals are held accountable for their actions regardless of their location. The relevance of this section is evident in criminal cases that involve multiple territorial divisions. For instance, if a criminal offense is committed within the jurisdiction of two different provinces or territories, this section helps in determining the jurisdiction in which the crime should be prosecuted. Similarly, it helps in determining the jurisdiction in which a crime is committed if it occurs at the border of two territories. Furthermore, section 2 helps in the interpretation of other provisions within the Criminal Code that refer to territorial divisions. It enables lawyers, judges, and law enforcement officers to understand the context in which these provisions apply and to ensure that the law is enforced in a consistent and fair manner. Overall, section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada is crucial in identifying the territorial divisions that are included within the Act. It provides a comprehensive definition that ensures consistency and clarity in the application of the law. Its significance is evident in criminal cases that involve multiple jurisdictions, where it helps in determining the correct jurisdiction in which to prosecute a crime. Moreover, the section also plays a vital role in ensuring that the law is enforced consistently and fairly across all parts of the country.


Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada defines the term "territorial division" and includes various political and judicial subdivisions, such as provinces, counties, townships, cities, and towns. This section of the Code is crucial in ensuring that the laws are properly enforced within their respective jurisdictions and that justice is delivered to the citizens. The strategic considerations when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code of Canada are many, including the following: 1. Understanding the Scope of Territorial Jurisdiction It is essential for the authorities to understand and determine the appropriate territorial jurisdiction for a specific incident. This is important as it affects the investigatory and enforcement approach that individual officers or teams take when dealing with a criminal act. Proper territorial jurisdiction allocation can help in resource management and enable an efficient and effective investigation process. 2. Timely Notification of the Incident Suppose a law enforcement officer or agency detects a criminal act within their jurisdiction. In that case, it is essential to promptly notify the relevant agencies or officers in other territorial divisions that the crime has occurred, especially if it's a large-scale crime scene that may require the collation of evidence from different towns or cities. This would help in the collection of evidence and the eventual charging of suspects. 3. Collaboration and Coordination among Jurisdictions Collaboration and coordination between territorial jurisdictions are essential to implementing effective criminal investigations and enforcing the criminal code of Canada. Law enforcement agencies should build and maintain relationships with counterparts from other jurisdictions to enable effective communication on suspected or ongoing investigations. Strategies that could be employed include the following: 1. Use of Technology The adoption of technology can help to facilitate better communication between agencies or officers from different jurisdictions. Police officers can use communication platforms or shared databases to seek support for cases from other territorial jurisdictions, and this would result in fast and efficient investigations. 2. Harmonious collaboration Police agencies should work closely with counterparts in other jurisdictions, through exchanging intelligence, intelligence-led operations, task forces, joint operations, and integrated investigative units. This ensures the quick identification, arrest, and prosecution of criminals. 3. Designing Specialized Training Programs The development of specialized training programs for law enforcement personnel around Canada can help to advance technology, strategy, and communication tools. This will ensure a seamless investigation process and optimize access to resources, which will aid in efficient investigations. In conclusion, Section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada is a critical section of the code, mainly because it designates the various territorial jurisdictions for criminal investigations and enforcement. The strategic considerations and ideas discussed in this piece can be helpful to various law enforcement agencies in Canada dealing with the Criminal Code of Canada and will enable them to operate effectively and efficiently. It is vital for law enforcement agencies to understand all territorial jurisdictions and collaborate more frequently to succeed in enforcing the Criminal Code of Canada.


The Territorial Court considers the definition of "territorial division" as it relates to jurisdiction on a kidnapping case that straddled the Alberta and Northwest Territories border. The court states: "...the test at present comes down to whether any element of the offence charged occurred in the territorial division where the offence is being prosecuted." A fullsome analysis of the caselaw is included at pages 96-97.
The Ontario Court of Appeal considers a case where portions of the criminal act occurred out of province, ultimately holding: "There was evidence before the learned provincial judge sufficient to permit him to properly form an opinion that the offence alleged in the information took place in Ontario where the omission by the appellant to discharge his legal duty to return the child occurred. Accordingly, he was entitled to conclude, as he did, that he had jurisdiction to put the appellant on trial."