section 22.2

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

An organization can be held responsible for an offence if a senior officer intends to benefit the organization and is directly involved in the offence or directs others to commit the offence, or the organization fails to take reasonable measures to prevent a representative from committing the offence.

SECTION WORDING

22.2 In respect of an offence that requires the prosecution to prove fault other than negligence an organization is a party to the offence if, with the intent at least in part to benefit the organization, one of its senior officers (a) acting within the scope of their authority, is a party to the offence; (b) having the mental state required to be a party to the offence and acting within the scope of their authority, directs the work of other representatives of the organization so that they do the act or make the omission specified in the offence; or (c) knowing that a representative of the organization is or is about to be a party to the offence, does not take all reasonable measures to stop them from being a party to the offence.

EXPLANATION

Section 22.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada establishes the principles according to which an organization can be held liable for an offense committed within it. According to this section, an organization can be prosecuted for an offense if one of its senior officers, acting within the scope of their authority and with the intent to benefit the organization, commits the act or omission that constitutes the offense. Additionally, if a senior officer, knowing that a representative of the organization is or is about to be a party to the offense, fails to take reasonable steps to prevent it, the organization can still be held liable. This provision is significant because it recognizes that companies can be held accountable for the actions of their employees, particularly if those actions were taken with the intent of benefiting the organization. It also acknowledges that sometimes, senior officers within an organization may not be directly involved in committing a criminal offense but can still be held accountable if they have knowledge of it and do not take appropriate action. While these principles are intended to encourage organizations to take steps to prevent offenses from occurring, they also serve as a warning to those who may try to commit offenses under the guise of benefiting a corporation or entity. Overall, Section 22.2 reflects the Canadian government's commitment to holding organizations accountable for wrongdoing and ensuring that they take steps to uphold ethical standards and prevent criminal activities from occurring within their institutions.

COMMENTARY

Section 22.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada establishes the liability of organizations for the criminal actions of their senior officers and representatives, providing an additional layer of accountability for corporate wrongdoing. This provision is essential in combating white-collar crime, where individuals in positions of power use their influence for personal gain, often at the expense of others and the organization they represent. The provision specifies that an organization can be held responsible for an offense that requires the prosecution to prove intent or knowledge if one of its senior officers acts within the scope of their authority and with the intent to benefit the organization. Additionally, the organization can be held responsible if a senior officer, with the required mental state, directs other representatives to act in a way that constitutes an offense, or if the organization knows that one of its representatives is about to commit an offense and fails to prevent it. The provision recognizes that an organization is not a physical entity capable of committing an offense itself but is a collection of people with varying levels of authority and responsibility. Therefore, if a senior officer or representative of an organization commits a crime, the organization as a whole should be held accountable for its actions. This approach recognizes that businesses have an ethical responsibility to operate with integrity and accountability, and have a role to play in maintaining the health and safety of the communities within which they operate. Section 22.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada highlights the need for organizations to implement robust compliance measures, including ethical codes of conduct, policies and procedures, risk assessments, training, and monitoring systems to prevent and detect potential criminal activity. By doing so, organizations can mitigate the risk of criminal acts being committed by their senior officers and representatives, thus reducing their liability under this provision. Organizations that fail to implement effective compliance measures not only expose themselves to criminal liability but also risk reputational damage, loss of investors and customers, fines, and civil litigation. Therefore, it is in the interest of businesses to prioritize compliance and ensure that they are operating in a way that is ethical, legal, and consistent with their obligations to society. In conclusion, section 22.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada is a critical provision in promoting corporate accountability and deterring white-collar crime. It reinforces the message that businesses have a social responsibility to operate with integrity and accountability, and provides a framework for holding organizations responsible for the criminal actions of their senior officers and representatives. By prioritizing compliance and implementing robust measures to prevent and detect potential criminal activity, organizations can protect themselves from potential criminal liability, safeguard their reputation, and contribute to the overall well-being of society.

STRATEGY

When dealing with section 22.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada, there are several strategic considerations that organizations should keep in mind. This section makes it possible for an organization to be held liable for certain offenses committed by senior officers or other representatives of the organization. Therefore, it is important for organizations to take steps to prevent criminal conduct and to have a plan in place in case an offense is committed. One strategic consideration is to have clear policies and procedures in place that outline what is acceptable behavior for senior officers and other representatives of the organization. These policies should be communicated to all employees so that everyone is aware of what is expected of them. Additionally, training should be provided to ensure that everyone understands the policies and the importance of complying with them. Another strategy is to conduct regular audits or assessments of the organization's operations to identify any areas that may be at risk of criminal conduct. This can help the organization to take steps to prevent criminal activity before it occurs. In some cases, organizations may need to conduct their own investigation into suspected criminal conduct by a representative of the organization. This can be a difficult and complex process, and it is important to have an experienced legal team that can help guide the organization through the process. In cases where an offense has already been committed, it is important for the organization to take immediate steps to mitigate any harm caused by the offense. This may involve cooperating with law enforcement and taking steps to compensate any victims of the offense. It is also important to have a plan in place to ensure that the organization is able to continue operating while dealing with the consequences of the offense. In order to prevent criminal conduct and minimize the risk of liability under section 22.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada, organizations should take a proactive approach to compliance and risk management. This may involve developing policies and procedures, conducting regular audits, providing training to employees, and working closely with legal and compliance professionals to ensure that the organization is always operating within the bounds of the law.

CATEGORIES