section 380.3(3)


The court may adjourn proceedings to allow victims to seek restitution or establish their losses if it does not interfere with the administration of justice.


380.3(3) On application of the prosecutor or on its own motion, the court may adjourn the proceedings to permit the victims to indicate whether they are seeking restitution or to establish their losses, if the court is satisfied that the adjournment would not interfere with the proper administration of justice.


Section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that enables the court to adjourn legal proceedings temporarily to allow victims to establish their losses or to indicate if they are seeking restitution. The section is significant in the Criminal Code as it recognizes the importance of victims' participation and involvement in the criminal justice process. The section allows the prosecutor or the court to initiate an adjournment if they believe that a victim's involvement is necessary for the fair administration of justice. This provision often comes into play in cases where a victim's loss or damage is unclear, and they ought to be given an opportunity to establish it. It serves to ensure that victims' interests are protected, and they receive necessary restitution from offenders. When the court adjourns proceedings, all parties involved in the case, especially the victim, are informed and given sufficient notice to ensure that they can attend or participate in the subsequent hearing. This is in line with the principle of natural justice, which dictates that all parties are accorded a fair hearing. Section 380.3(3) is particularly essential in cases of fraud, theft, and other economic crimes and offenses where the loss or damage suffered by victims is not immediately apparent. The provision gives victims a voice and empowers them to participate in legal proceedings and seek meaningful remedies for the harm suffered. Ultimately, this leads to a fairer, more just criminal justice system.


Section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an innovative and practical provision that underscores the Canadian justice system's acknowledgment of the importance of restitution and compensation for victims of crime. The section allows the prosecutor to request a court to adjourn legal proceedings in order to provide victims with the opportunity to indicate whether or not they seek restitution or to establish their losses. The provision is beneficial for several reasons. First, it is a measure that recognizes the significance of the restitution and compensation for the victim and the critical role it plays in their healing process. Often, victims of crime are left traumatized, injured, and financially burdened by their experience. By providing them with the opportunity to seek restitution, the victim could recover some of the losses they sustained, such as medical expenses, lost wages, or damage to property. This provision is essential because it helps to make victims whole again, to the largest extent possible. Secondly, section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a critical tool for the criminal justice system to facilitate the victim's recovery immediately after the offender has caused harm. As such, it enables the victim to access legal avenues to seek restitution and compensation. It underscores the relevance of the state offering the victim some support when it appears that the offender will not make whole the damage done. In this way, the Canadian criminal justice system uses the law as an opportunity for restoration. Third, the section empowers the prosecutor to be the victim's advocate and champion their rights. As a result, the prosecutor can take action to facilitate the victim's request for restitution. This feature is of significant importance because the victim may not have the resource or skills to do so themselves. The need for such representation points to the inherent powerlessness of victims in the criminal justice system and speaks to how vital it is that the state provides them with opportunities to recover what has been lost. Finally, section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada facilitates an expeditious and efficient way of dealing with restitution issues, with minimal disruption to the court proceedings. It ensures that the reimbursement process does not interfere with the criminal trial itself. This important feature demonstrates that the Canadian justice system recognizes the complexity and unique challenges of addressing a victim's demands for restitution or compensation within the context of a criminal trial. However, despite the positive aspects of the section, there are limitations and potential drawbacks. For one, given that the process is voluntary, the victim may choose not to participate, which ultimately negates its utility. Secondly, the prosecutor may not prioritize the victim's concerns, and their decision to request adjournment may be influenced by other factors that are not primarily directed at helping the victim recover. In conclusion, section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a progressive and necessary provision that helps to address the challenges of providing restitution and compensation to victims of crime. It provides an opportunity for the prosecutor to advocate for the victim's rights, facilitating a conducive atmosphere where the victim can secure compensation without interfering with the criminal trial. Ultimately, such a provision allows the Canadian criminal justice system to acknowledge the affected individuals' challenges and support them in their quest to recover.


Section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides the opportunity for victims of an offense to seek restitution or establish their losses. This section can be strategic for both prosecutors and defense attorneys in crafting their approach to a case. For prosecutors, seeking an adjournment under this section can be a tactic to demonstrate to the court that they are mindful of the victim's interests and the impact of the crime on the victim. This can be a helpful strategy in building credibility with the court, especially in cases where the defendant is arguing for a lenient sentence or presenting mitigating circumstances. One significant consideration for prosecutors is whether the victim is likely to pursue restitution, as this can have implications for the sentence. If the defendant is ordered to pay restitution, this can be a significant penalty, particularly for financial crimes. Defendants may be more willing to negotiate a plea agreement or plead guilty if they know that the victim is seeking restitution, as this can limit the financial consequences of a sentence. Defense attorneys, on the other hand, may seek to oppose an adjournment under section 380.3(3) if they believe that it would be prejudicial to their client. An adjournment may give prosecutors more time to build their case or encourage the victim to pursue a harsher sentence. Defense attorneys may also argue that the adjournment would infringe on their client's right to a speedy trial. Another strategic consideration for defense attorneys is whether or not to negotiate with the victim over restitution. In some cases, offering to pay restitution can be a compelling way to persuade the victim to be more lenient in their testimony or to drop charges altogether. However, admitting guilt to the victim in exchange for leniency may not always be the best strategy, particularly if the defendant maintains their innocence or if the evidence against them is weak. To navigate these strategic considerations, both prosecutors and defense attorneys can employ a variety of strategies. For prosecutors, seeking input from the victim early in the case and involving them in the process can build trust and credibility. Prosecutors may also work with the victim to determine the appropriate amount of restitution and secure an agreement from the defendant before going to trial. Defense attorneys, on the other hand, may seek to challenge the victim's claims about their losses or present evidence that mitigates the impact of the defendant's actions. Defense attorneys may also work to build their client's credibility with the court by presenting mitigating circumstances or crafting a sympathetic narrative that shows the defendant as remorseful and willing to make amends. In conclusion, section 380.3(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada offers both prosecutors and defense attorneys an opportunity to strategically manage the impact of a victim's claims on a case. By understanding the victim's interests and crafting an approach that takes into consideration the potential for restitution, both sides can navigate this section effectively to achieve the best possible outcome for their client or the victim.