section 382.1(3)


This section clarifies that an act is not a crime under Section 382.1 if it is authorized, required, or not prohibited by any applicable federal or provincial law or regulation.


382.1(3) For greater certainty, an act is not an offence under this section if it is authorized or required, or is not prohibited, by any federal or provincial Act or regulation applicable to it.


Section 382.1(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada aims to clarify that an act is not considered an offence if it is authorized, required, or not prohibited under any applicable federal or provincial Act or regulation. This provision aims to ensure that individuals or organizations are not penalized for performing certain actions or activities that are permitted or required by law. For instance, a medical practitioner may be required to administer a drug for medical treatment that could potentially induce sleep, rendering the patient unable to operate a motor vehicle immediately after the procedure. Although this act could be considered an offence under impaired driving legislation, the health practitioner would not be held criminally liable since the act is authorized and required by a federal or provincial regulation related to medical practice. The provision also takes into account situations where an entity is authorized to perform certain acts that would otherwise be considered criminal activities. For example, a police officer may have to use force while making an arrest, which could be interpreted as an assault offence under the Criminal Code. In this situation, the officer would not be penalized for the act since it is authorized under a federal or provincial Act or regulation applicable to policing. In summary, Section 382.1(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada seeks to protect individuals and organizations from criminal sanctions for actions that are authorized, required, or not prohibited by applicable federal or provincial laws or regulations.


Section 382.1(3) is a crucial provision in the Canadian Criminal Code that clarifies the interpretation of the offence of fraud. It essentially states that an action cannot be considered fraudulent if it is authorized, required or not prohibited by any provincial or federal Act or regulation that applies to it. This provision is important because it recognizes the importance of context in the commission of fraudulent acts and ensures that individuals and businesses are not unfairly penalized for actions that fall within the ambit of the law. The inclusion of this provision is particularly relevant in the current legal and business landscape. The pace of technological advancement has provided new ways of conducting business, and regulators have been striving to keep pace with emerging challenges. For example, the introduction of digital currencies, blockchain technology and decentralized finance (DeFi) have raised questions about how Canadian law applies to these novel financial instruments. The provision reassures the legal community and the general public that the law will not be used to hinder innovation or to unfairly penalize individuals who operate within existing legal frameworks. Furthermore, the provision reflects the principles of good corporate conduct. Businesses and corporations are increasingly being held accountable for fraudulent actions committed on their behalf or by their employees. This provision creates an incentive for businesses and regulators to develop mechanisms to oversee and control the conduct of employees and ensure that fraudulent activity is prevented or detected early. It also encourages companies to conduct business in a transparent and legal manner. The provision has its limitations, however. It may be interpreted differently by different courts, leading to inconsistencies in the application of the law. This could potentially create legal uncertainty for businesses and individuals who operate within the boundaries of the law. Moreover, it is important to note that the provision does not provide blanket immunity to individuals or businesses that act within existing legal frameworks. The courts will still be required to analyze individual cases and determine whether the conduct of the accused falls within the legal boundaries of the Act or regulation in question. Nevertheless, the provision provides a clear framework for interpreting fraud cases and acknowledges the importance of context when analyzing fraudulent behaviour. It allows businesses and individuals to operate within the bounds of the law without fear of unexpected legal repercussions. Ultimately, it bolsters the spirit of innovation, entrepreneurship and creativity that lies at the heart of the Canadian economy.


Section 382.1(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides protection for individuals, organizations, and corporations from criminal liability if their actions were authorized or required by applicable federal or provincial Acts or regulations, or were not prohibited by such laws. The protection provided under this section is essential in preventing the criminalization of conduct that is permitted under law or policy. However, it is important to note that Section 382.1(3) does not provide blanket protection against criminal liability. The authorization or requirement to undertake the conduct must be clear and unambiguous, and the conduct must have been carried out in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. Moreover, if the conduct is not expressly authorized or required, it may still be subject to criminal liability. In light of the complex and ever-evolving legal landscape, businesses and organizations may face challenges in determining whether their actions are authorized or prohibited. Therefore, it is important to employ a range of strategies to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. One strategy that organizations could employ is to establish comprehensive compliance programs that provide guidance on legal and regulatory requirements. These programs should include policies and procedures that address the specific laws and regulations applicable to the organization, as well as employee training and monitoring to ensure adherence to the program. Another strategy is to seek legal advice before engaging in conduct that could potentially trigger criminal liability. Legal advisors could help identify the applicable laws and regulations and provide guidance on the extent to which Section 382.1(3) applies. In addition, organizations could consider engaging in advocacy efforts to shape the legal and regulatory framework in which they operate. This could involve lobbying for changes to existing laws and regulations or advocating for the creation of new laws that provide greater clarity and protection. Furthermore, organizations could implement risk management strategies to minimize the risk of criminal liability. This could involve conducting regular assessments of the organization's operations to identify potential risks and implementing appropriate controls to mitigate those risks. In conclusion, while Section 382.1(3) provides protection against criminal liability for conduct that is authorized or required by applicable federal or provincial Acts or regulations, it is essential that organizations remain diligent in their efforts to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Employing strategies such as comprehensive compliance programs, seeking legal advice, engaging in advocacy efforts, and implementing risk management strategies can help organizations navigate the complex legal landscape and avoid criminal liability.