section 47(4)


The sentence of life imprisonment is a minimum punishment for Part XXIII of the Criminal Code of Canada.


47(4) For the purposes of Part XXIII, the sentence of imprisonment for life prescribed by subsection (1) is a minimum punishment.


Section 47(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that sets out the minimum punishment for certain offences under Part XXIII of the Criminal Code. This section stipulates that the sentence of imprisonment for life prescribed by subsection (1) is a minimum punishment. Subsection (1) specifies that a person convicted of first-degree murder is liable to imprisonment for life. This provision is important because it establishes that the sentence of life imprisonment is the minimum punishment for first-degree murder in Canada. This means that judges are not allowed to impose a lower sentence for this offence. In practical terms, this means that a person convicted of first-degree murder will serve a minimum sentence of 25 years before being eligible for parole. The purpose of this provision is to ensure that first-degree murder is treated as a very serious offence that warrants the harshest punishment available under Canadian law. This is consistent with the principle of proportionality in sentencing, which requires that the punishment should reflect the gravity of the crime. Overall, Section 47(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada sets out an important principle in Canadian criminal law. It establishes that first-degree murder is a very serious crime that warrants a severe punishment, and ensures that this punishment is the minimum sentence that can be imposed for this offence.


Section 47(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a crucial provision that governs sentences for serious criminal offenses under Part XXIII of the Code. This subsection is especially significant because it sets out the minimum punishment for offenses that carry a sentence of imprisonment for life. The concept of a minimum punishment is designed to reflect the gravity of the offense and to provide a clear indication to the judiciary of what is considered an appropriate sentence for such offenses. The designation of a minimum sentence underscores the severity of the offense and the need for a commensurate penalty to ensure that the punishment fits the crime. The specific sentencing provision of section 47(4) applies to a wide range of offenses that carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, including murder, manslaughter, treason, and high treason, among others. For these offenses, the provision provides that the sentence of imprisonment for life is a minimum punishment, which means that judges cannot impose a lower sentence for these offenses. Section 47(4) serves a significant purpose in Canada's criminal justice system. It provides a clear signal to both the public and the judiciary that the gravity of certain offenses demands a substantial punishment, and that the punishment for such offenses must be severe to discourage and deter people from committing them. The provision also represents a recognition by lawmakers that certain crimes are so heinous and reprehensible that they warrant the harshest possible punishment. Given the profound impact that serious crimes can have on victims and society at large, there is a need for punishment that reflects the severity of these offenses. Moreover, the minimum punishment specified by section 47(4) is meant to ensure a degree of consistency in sentencing for serious criminal offenses. By setting out a clear minimum sentence, this provision helps to prevent judges from imposing lower sentences that might not be proportional to the seriousness of the offense. In practice, the impact of section 47(4) can be seen in the sentencing decisions of courts across Canada. For example, in a recent case before the Alberta Court of Appeal, the court upheld a sentence of life imprisonment without parole eligibility for 23 years for first-degree murder, based on the minimum punishment specified by section 47(4). However, some commentators have criticized the provision for being too inflexible and creating a "one size fits all" approach to sentencing. They argue that judicial discretion is an essential component of any criminal justice system and that mandatory minimum sentences can prevent judges from considering the unique circumstances of each case and imposing a sentence that is appropriate in the circumstances. Despite these criticisms, the importance of section 47(4) cannot be overstated. Ensuring that sentences for serious criminal offenses are severe and consistent is critical to maintaining public confidence in the criminal justice system. By providing a clear minimum punishment for such offenses, section 47(4) sends a message that Canada takes the most serious crimes seriously and that those who commit them will face the full force of the law.


Section 47(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada has significant implications for defendants convicted of first-degree murder, as it mandates a life sentence with no possibility of parole for 25 years. As such, it is essential for defense counsel to carefully consider strategic options in cases where this section of the Criminal Code is applicable. This essay will explore some of these considerations, as well as potential strategies for dealing with section 47(4). One of the most important strategic considerations when dealing with section 47(4) is the fact that it is a mandatory minimum sentence. This means that judges have no discretion in sentencing beyond the minimum 25-year period of parole ineligibility. As such, defense counsel's job is not to persuade the judge to reduce the sentence, but rather to develop a strategy for mitigating the impact of the mandatory minimum on their client. A key aspect of this strategy is to ensure that the judge has as much information as possible about the mitigating factors in the case. This could include evidence of mental health issues, traumatic life experiences, or other circumstances that may have contributed to the defendant's actions. Counsel may also wish to present evidence of their client's good character, such as community involvement or a successful career, in order to paint a more complete picture of the defendant. Another important consideration is the role of plea bargaining in cases where section 47(4) applies. Given the severity of the sentence prescribed, defense counsel may wish to negotiate a plea deal that results in a conviction on a lesser charge. This could involve accepting a guilty plea for second-degree murder, or even a non-murder charge such as manslaughter. While this strategy requires a delicate balancing act between protecting the client's interests and securing a favorable plea deal, it can be an effective way to avoid the most severe consequences of a first-degree murder conviction. Alternatively, defense counsel may choose to focus their efforts on the sentencing phase of the trial. While the mandatory minimum sentence cannot be avoided, there are potential avenues for reducing the impact of the sentence on the defendant. One strategy is to argue for concurrent sentencing, which would allow the defendant to serve their sentence for first-degree murder alongside any other sentences they may be required to serve for related offenses. This could reduce the total amount of time that the defendant spends behind bars. Another potential strategy is to argue for eligibility for parole after 25 years have been served. While section 47(4) technically prohibits parole for the first 25 years of a life sentence, there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, a defendant who has cooperated with authorities in the investigation or prosecution of other offenses may be eligible for early parole. Additionally, in cases where the defendant may be approaching the end of their natural lifespan, defense counsel may be able to argue for compassionate release. In conclusion, section 47(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a significant hurdle for defendants charged with first-degree murder. However, there are several strategic considerations and options available to defense counsel when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code. Whether through plea bargaining, mitigation, or creative sentencing arguments, defense counsel can help their clients navigate the complex and unforgiving landscape of mandatory minimum sentences.