Criminal Code of Canada - section 498(3) - Consequences of non-release

section 498(3)

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

An officer who does not release a detained person for an offense as soon as possible is deemed lawful unless it can be proven otherwise.

SECTION WORDING

498(3) An officer in charge or another peace officer who has the custody of a person taken into or detained in custody for an offence described in subsection (1) and who does not release the person from custody as soon as practicable in the manner described in that subsection shall be deemed to be acting lawfully and in the execution of the officer’s duty for the purposes of (a) any proceedings under this or any other Act of Parliament; or (b) any other proceedings, unless in any such proceedings it is alleged and established by the person making the allegation that the officer in charge or other peace officer did not comply with the requirements of subsection (1).

EXPLANATION

Section 498(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada outlines the legal responsibilities of officers in charge and other peace officers who have custody of a person detained for an offence. If the officer fails to release the individual in a timely manner, they can still be deemed to have acted lawfully and within their duty, except in cases where it is alleged and proven that they did not comply with the requirements outlined in subsection (1) of this section. This subsection is intended to provide some protection for peace officers, who may not always be able to release individuals immediately. For example, if the individual poses a danger to themselves or others or if there is a risk of them fleeing, the officer may need to detain them for longer than what is considered "reasonable" under subsection (1). In some cases, the officer in charge may also need to seek approval from a judicial authority before releasing the individual. However, it is important to note that this protection is not absolute. If the officer in charge or other peace officer fails to comply with the requirements of subsection (1) and is alleged and proven to have acted unlawfully, they can still be held accountable for their actions. This subsection is not intended to shield officers from liability in cases of wrongdoing. Overall, section 498(3) is designed to balance the need for public safety and the rights of individuals who have been detained. It provides officers with some flexibility in their duties while also ensuring that they are held accountable for any violations of the law.

COMMENTARY

Section 498(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that provides relief to the officers in charge, or any other peace officer who has the custody of a person taken into or detained in custody, for an offense described in subsection (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The provision stipulates that such officers are deemed to be acting lawfully, and in the execution of their duties, if they do not release the detained person from custody as soon as practicable, as described in subsection (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. However, this protection is not available if it can be established that the officer in charge or other peace officer did not comply with the requirements of subsection (1). This section is designed to protect officers who have detained someone under circumstances that appear to require custody, but who later turn out not to. Such circumstances can include false accusations, mistaken identity, or the discovery of new evidence. By providing officers with protection when they follow the proper procedures, the provision encourages them to ensure that due diligence is carried out before taking someone into custody. Additionally, the protection provided by this section can help to prevent frivolous lawsuits or allegations of misconduct against officers. However, this section is not without limitations and criticisms. Some argue that the provision does not go far enough in protecting officers, particularly in situations where they are responsible for egregious violations of a detainee's rights. In such cases, the provision may be seen as condoning or exonerating wrongful conduct. Additionally, the section does not provide any guidance on how soon "as practicable" is, leaving it open for interpretation by officers. Despite these limitations, Section 498(3) serves an important purpose in the Criminal Code of Canada. By providing protection to officers who follow prescribed protocols, the provision encourages due diligence and adherence to proper procedures, even in challenging circumstances. While the provision may not be perfect, it is a necessary component of the Canadian criminal justice system, balancing the rights of individuals with the needs of law enforcement.

STRATEGY

Section 498(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada offers a level of legal protection for officers in charge or other peace officers who detain and hold prisoners for offenses described in Subsection (1). The section provides a safe harbor for officers who do not release a prisoner from custody as soon as practicable, as long as they act in compliance with the procedures outlined in Subsection (1). Although this section provides a level of protection for officers, police organizations, and lawyers must strategize to ensure that they do not fall afoul of its provisions. One strategic consideration when dealing with Section 498(3) is understanding the legal requirements of Subsection (1). In most cases, an officer in charge or another peace officer must release a person taken into or detained in custody as soon as practicable when: - The charge against the person has been dealt with, either through an appearance notice, summons, or warrant; - The person has been brought before a justice, and an appearance notice or summons has been issued; or - The person has been remanded in custody or released on bail. Officers and police organizations should ensure that they are familiar with these requirements to avoid claiming protection under Section 498(3) when they have acted outside of Subsection (1)'s provisions. Another strategic consideration is to document the reasons for detaining a prisoner beyond the parameters of Subsection (1). Officers in charge or other peace officers should ensure that they document their reasons for detaining a prisoner beyond the time frames outlined in Subsection (1) and provide justification for the delay in release. Documentation may include details on the person's health, welfare, or other relevant factors that need to be considered when deciding whether to release or detain them. A third strategic consideration is to ensure that officers only rely on Section 498(3) in instances when they have complied with the requirements of Subsection (1). To do this, lawyers may advise officers to conduct regular reviews of their arrest and detainment procedures to identify any breaches of the law. This may include updating their training manuals, ensuring officers are aware of their legal obligations, and conducting regular audits to identify any issues. In conclusion, Section 498(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides a level of protection for officers in charge or other peace officers when they detain and hold prisoners who have committed offences described in Subsection (1). To maximize this protection, officers, lawyers, and police organizations must ensure that they comply with the legal requirements outlined in Subsection (1), document the reasons for detaining prisoners beyond its provisions, and avoid relying on Section 498(3) when they have acted outside of Subsection (1)'s parameters. By doing so, they can ensure that they are acting in compliance with the law and minimize the risk of legal challenges.