section 54

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

It is a criminal offence to aid, assist, harbour, or conceal a known deserter or absentee without leave from the Canadian Forces without the consent of the Attorney General of Canada.

SECTION WORDING

54. Every one who aids, assists, harbours or conceals a person who he knows is a deserter or absentee without leave from the Canadian Forces is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction, but no proceedings shall be instituted under this section without the consent of the Attorney General of Canada.

EXPLANATION

Section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada outlines the criminal offense of aiding, assisting, harboring, or concealing a person who is a deserter or absentee without leave from the Canadian Forces. This section is designed to ensure that anyone who knowingly helps a person who has deserted or gone AWOL from the Canadian forces is held accountable for their actions. The offense outlined in section 54 is punishable on summary conviction, which means that if found guilty, an individual can be sentenced to a maximum of two years in prison or a fine. However, before proceedings can be initiated under this section, the Attorney General of Canada must give their consent. This requirement is in place to ensure that this offense is not used inappropriately to target individuals who are not deserving of prosecution. The purpose of section 54 is to maintain the discipline and integrity of the Canadian Forces. Desertion or going AWOL is a serious offense that can have a significant impact on the operation, morale, and safety of the Canadian Forces. Individuals who assist or facilitate this kind of misconduct can hinder the efforts of the Canadian Forces and put the safety of others at risk. In summary, section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada is an offense that punishes individuals who help people who have deserted or gone AWOL from the Canadian Forces. It is designed to maintain discipline and integrity in the Canadian Forces and ensure that individuals who knowingly facilitate these offenses are held accountable for their actions.

COMMENTARY

Section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada makes it clear that any person who provides aid, assistance, harbour or concealment to a deserter or absentee without leave from the Canadian Forces is guilty of an offence. The punishment for this offence is summary conviction, which suggests that there are relatively minor penalties meted out compared to other offences in the Code that carry significant mandatory minimums or maximum sentences. However, it is important to note that consent of the Attorney General of Canada is required before proceeding with legal action against an individual for violating this provision. From the language of the section, we can see that the Canadian government is committed to ensuring the safety and security of Canadian Forces personnel. The Penal provision aims to ensure that no individual absconds or deserts from the force. It is a criminal offense to facilitate or enable such actions by providing support or assistance to a deserter, knowing full well that one's actions are illegal and in violation of the Criminal Code of Canada. As a general principle, Canadian society values military personnel. Politicians routinely praise their efforts and commit to supporting them with jobs and other benefits. The Criminal Code is one of the most powerful tools in helping to preserve the well-being of military personnel and to send a message to others who might consider engaging in similar illegal activities. The code speaks to the government's commitment to protecting the men and women who serve the country and owes it to them to take swift and decisive action against anyone who would do them harm. It is also important to note that Canadians tend to hold a high degree of respect for the legal professionals and the members of the judiciary and legislature who crafted the Code. These individuals spent a great deal of time and effort to ensure that it is easy to read, understand and apply in the most effective manner possible. As a result, Canadians hold these individuals in high esteem and understand that committing a crime against them, directly or indirectly, is a significant breach of the trust the public places in them. One potential weakness in Section 54 is that it does not define what constitutes "assistance," "harbour," or "concealment" in the context of this offence. This can leave decisions up to the requesting attorney general about what conduct should be considered an offense. This lack of specificity can impact the way that the section operates on an individual case basis and can create substantial differences in case law outcomes. In conclusion, Section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada is vital in ensuring the safety and security of Canadian Forces personnel. Through safeguarding these individuals, the government is expressing its gratitude and respect to those who have committed themselves to serving their country. While there may be limitations in the specific definition of the prohibited conduct, the provision plays an essential role in keeping members of the armed forces free from harm and ensuring that any individuals who assist towards desertion or absenteeism are held accountable for their actions.

STRATEGY

Section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada is a controversial and sensitive issue as it concerns the Canadian Forces. It is an offence to aid, assist, harbour or conceal a person who is a deserter or absentee without leave from the Canadian Forces. The section is punishable by summary conviction, and proceedings cannot be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General of Canada. Strategic considerations when dealing with section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada would include the effect it could have on public opinion, the military, and the accused. The accused could face significant consequences, both legal and social, including imprisonment and damage to their reputation. The military may also see this section as vital to maintaining order and discipline, and any perceived weak enforcement could lead to a loss of confidence in the military justice system. Therefore, it is essential to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of prosecution before deciding on a course of action. One strategy that could be employed is to use this section to maintain order and discipline in the military while avoiding negative public opinion. This could be achieved by rigorously enforcing the section while making sure the public understands its significance to the military justice system. Strengthening the link between the military justice system and the public could also lead to a better understanding of the role this section plays in maintaining order and discipline within the Canadian Forces. Another strategy could be to approach this section on a case-by-case basis and consider the particular circumstances of each case. This could involve assessing the seriousness of the offence and the intentions of the deserter or absentee. In cases where the offender is seeking help or is in a state of distress, less punitive measures should be considered to avoid adding to the individual's troubles. A third strategy that could be employed is to increase public awareness of the consequences of desertion or absence without leave. This could include having public information campaigns that not only raise awareness of the issue but also inform the public on the ramifications of such actions. This approach could make people think twice before providing assistance in such situations and also increase the likelihood of prosecution for those who do. In conclusion, section 54 of the Criminal Code of Canada is a critical section for the Canadian Forces and the public. The aim of any strategy employed should be to maintain order and discipline in the Forces while enabling the justice system to deal with offenders appropriately. Strategic considerations to ensure that the effect on public opinion, the military, and the accused is considered before deciding on a course of action. Maintaining a delicate balance between military discipline and public opinion can lead to a solution beneficial to all parties involved.

CATEGORIES