INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

This section defines when an aircraft is considered to be in service for the purposes of the Criminal Code of Canada.

SECTION WORDING

7(9) For the purposes of this section and section 77, an aircraft shall be deemed to be in service from the time when pre-flight preparation of the aircraft by ground personnel or the crew thereof begins for a specific flight until (a) the flight is cancelled before the aircraft is in flight, (b) twenty-four hours after the aircraft, having commenced the flight, lands, or (c) the aircraft, having commenced the flight, ceases to be in flight, whichever is the latest.

EXPLANATION

Section 7(9) of the Criminal Code of Canada refers to the definition of an "in-service" aircraft for the purpose of criminalizing certain acts committed within or against an aircraft. This section establishes that an aircraft is deemed to be in service from the moment pre-flight preparations begin for a specific flight until the flight is cancelled, 24 hours after landing, or ceases to be in flight - whichever comes last. This definition of an in-service aircraft is crucial for the application of offences outlined in sections 75 to 78 of the Criminal Code, which deal with acts that endanger or interfere with the safety of an aircraft or its occupants. For example, if a person intentionally damages an aircraft while it is on the tarmac during pre-flight preparation, they could be charged with mischief endangering life under section 430(1.1) of the Criminal Code. Additionally, this definition is relevant for section 77 of the Criminal Code, which deals with hijacking an aircraft. This section states that a person commits an offence if they hijack an aircraft while it is in service. The definition of an in-service aircraft provided in section 7(9) becomes relevant in determining whether or not a hijacking offence has been committed. Overall, section 7(9) of the Criminal Code is an important provision in establishing the definition of an in-service aircraft for the purposes of applying various offences related to aircraft safety and security.

COMMENTARY

Section 7(9) of the Criminal Code of Canada is particularly significant as it establishes the conditions under which an aircraft is considered to be in service. This section is crucial in determining the scope and extent of criminal liability for offenses involving aircraft, including hijacking and endangering the safety of an aircraft. According to this section, an aircraft is deemed to be in service from the time when pre-flight preparation of the aircraft by ground personnel or the crew thereof begins for a specific flight, until the flight is cancelled before the aircraft is in flight, twenty-four hours after the aircraft, having commenced the flight, lands or the aircraft, having commenced the flight, ceases to be in flight, whichever is the latest. This definition is broad and encompasses a wide range of activities that occur on the ground and in the air. The broad scope of this definition is logical considering that an aircraft is a complex and dynamic machine that requires considerable time and effort to prepare for each flight. The process of preparing an aircraft for a flight involves a range of activities, including maintenance, fueling and loading, and safety checks. These activities are conducted by ground personnel, which includes airport officials, maintenance crews, and air traffic controllers. The crew of an aircraft also plays a crucial role in preparing the aircraft for a flight, which includes checking the aircraft systems, conducting a pre-flight briefing, and assessing weather conditions. The definition of an aircraft in service established by this section is important in determining the applicability of certain provisions in the Criminal Code of Canada. For instance, individuals who hijack an aircraft or commit offenses that endanger the safety of an aircraft can be charged and prosecuted under the Criminal Code. The definition of an aircraft in service means that these offenses can be committed not only while the aircraft is in flight but also during the preparation and post-flight stages. The 24-hour timeframe established by this definition is particularly noteworthy, as it provides clarity as to when an aircraft is deemed to no longer be in service. This timeframe is necessary to ensure that an aircraft can be used for other purposes or undergo further maintenance once a flight has been completed. The fact that this timeframe is measured from the time of landing also reflects the importance of post-flight safety checks and procedures, which are essential for ensuring the safe operation of aircraft. In conclusion, section 7(9) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an essential provision that establishes the conditions for determining when an aircraft is considered to be in service. This definition is significant in determining the scope and extent of criminal liability for offenses related to the hijacking, endangerment or safety of aircraft. The broad definition of an aircraft in service reflects the complex and dynamic nature of aircraft and highlights the importance of the role played by all personnel involved in the preparation, operation, and maintenance of aircraft.

STRATEGY

Section 7(9) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines when an aircraft can be considered in service for the purposes of criminal liability. Understanding this section is crucial for those involved in aviation, including ground personnel, flight crew, and aviation managers. One strategic consideration when dealing with this section is ensuring that pre-flight preparation is conducted meticulously and in compliance with regulations. This includes conducting a thorough inspection of the aircraft, complying with weight and balance restrictions, and ensuring that all necessary equipment and documentation are on board. By doing so, the aircraft can be deemed to be in service from the time pre-flight preparation begins, reducing the risk of criminal liability. Another strategic consideration is communicating clearly and effectively with ground personnel and crew. This includes ensuring that they are aware of their obligations under Section 7(9), and providing them with the information and resources necessary to comply. Additionally, it is important to establish a reporting protocol for incidents or accidents that occur during the period of service defined by this section. A strategy that could be employed to mitigate the risk of criminal liability under Section 7(9) is to implement a comprehensive safety management system (SMS). An SMS involves identifying hazards and mitigating risks to prevent accidents or incidents. By implementing an SMS, aviation operators can demonstrate due diligence and a commitment to safety, which can help to reduce the risk of criminal liability. Additionally, aviation operators can develop and implement policies and procedures that reflect compliance with Section 7(9) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This includes conducting regular audits and reviews of operations to ensure compliance. By doing so, aviation operators can demonstrate a proactive approach to regulatory compliance, reducing the risk of criminal liability. In conclusion, compliance with Section 7(9) of the Criminal Code of Canada is crucial for those involved in aviation. Strategic considerations include meticulous pre-flight preparation, clear communication with ground personnel and crew, and the implementation of a comprehensive safety management system. Aviation operators can also develop and implement policies and procedures that reflect compliance with this section, and conduct regular audits and reviews to ensure compliance. By doing so, they can reduce the risk of criminal liability and demonstrate a commitment to safety and regulatory compliance.

RELATED SECTIONS