section 70(2)


This section allows for orders to be made applicable to specific places or assemblies as specified in the order.


70(2) An order that is made under subsection (1) may be general or may be made applicable to particular places, districts or assemblies to be specified in the order.


Section 70(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada governs the issuance of orders in connection with seditious activities. Section 70(1) provides for the possibility of an order being issued by a court against any group or individual that is involved in seditious activities. Such activities include advocating the use of force to bring about a change in government, urging the public to use violence to accomplish a political end, or attempting to overthrow the government of Canada by violent means. Section 70(2) specifies that the order can be general or it can detail specific places, districts or assemblies that are to be affected by the order. This provides greater flexibility for the courts when regulating the activities of the group or individual involved in seditious activities. A general order may be issued to restrict the activities of a group or individual throughout the country, while an order that is made applicable to particular places, districts or assemblies may be more suitable for situations where the seditious activities are centred in a specific location. The context of these provisions is the promotion and maintenance of law and order in the country. Sedition is a serious crime that poses a direct threat to the stability of the government, and orders issued under section 70 of the Criminal Code are designed to curtail the activities of those who seek to overthrow the government by force or violent means. By authorizing the issuance of orders that target specific areas or groups engaged in seditious activities, section 70(2) helps to safeguard the Canadian society from threats to the rule of law and democratic institutions.


Section 70(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an important provision that allows law enforcement authorities to maintain public order and safety during crisis situations. The section empowers peace officers to issue orders that can be general or specific, to contain or prevent situations that may threaten public safety. The provision of this section is essential for ensuring that law enforcement authorities have the necessary powers to control situations that may pose a threat to the public. The provision can be applied in circumstances such as riots, protests, and other gatherings where there is a likelihood of violence or danger. The section allows the orders issued under it to be general or specific. This means that law enforcement officers can tailor their orders to specific situations. For example, they may issue orders that apply to a particular place, district or assembly or a broader application that might be required in a larger geographical area. The issuance of a general order might be used in situations where there is a high probability of violence, and it is essential to contain the area to prevent the situation from escalating. On the other hand, a law enforcement officer may issue a specific order to prevent an individual or group from engaging in harmful actions. Section 70(2) is also designed to balance public safety concerns with the protection of fundamental freedoms such as the right to peaceful assembly, expression and association. While it is essential to preserve public order, it is equally crucial to ensure that the rights of people are not unreasonably restricted. Law enforcement authorities must be mindful of the need to respect the rights of citizens while enforcing the law. In conclusion, Section 70(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an important provision that provides essential powers to law enforcement authorities to maintain public order and safety. The provision is designed to balance public safety concerns with the protection of fundamental freedoms and ensures that citizens' rights are respected in the process. The section is an essential tool for law enforcement authorities, ensuring that they can contain and prevent dangerous situations that may threaten public safety.


Section 70(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada empowers a court to make an order that applies to a particular assembly, district, or place, or a general order that applies to the entire country. This section has significant implications for law enforcement as it empowers them to control and regulate public assemblies within their jurisdiction. In this essay, we will explore the strategic considerations when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code of Canada and the strategies that could be employed. Strategic Considerations: 1. Prioritizing public safety: One of the main strategic considerations when dealing with section 70(2) is the primacy of public safety. The courts are empowered to make orders that safeguard the public's wellbeing, especially during public assemblies that have the potential to erupt in violence or disorder. 2. Balancing personal freedom and public interest: Section 70(2) requires a delicate balance between personal freedom and public interest. While Canadian citizens enjoy fundamental rights and freedoms, these rights are not absolute and must be curtailed when they pose a threat to public safety or the public interest. 3. Avoiding unconstitutional orders: It is crucial to ensure that any orders made under section 70(2) do not violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In this regard, the courts must consider the reasonableness of any limitation on individual freedoms and avoid making orders that restrict free expression or assembly unlawfully. 4. Political implications: Orders made under section 70(2) may have significant political implications. Governments and law enforcement agencies must carefully consider the impact of any orders they make on the public's perception of their legitimacy and credibility. Strategies that could be employed: 1. Collaboration and consultation: It is crucial to engage with stakeholders, including organizers of public assemblies, to ensure that any orders made under section 70(2) are fair, reasonable, and acceptable to all parties. This can be done by fostering dialogue, seeking input from all stakeholders, and finding solutions that balance public safety with the protection of individual freedoms. 2. Proactive preparation: Law enforcement agencies can employ proactive measures such as developing emergency response plans, training officers to handle public assemblies, and monitoring social media for potential threats. 3. Use of technology: Modern technology can be used to monitor and track public assemblies, analyze data, and detect potential sources of violence or disorder before they occur. This could involve using drones and CCTV cameras to provide real-time situational awareness. 4. Respect for individual rights: Any orders made under section 70(2) must respect individual rights and freedoms, including freedom of expression, assembly, and association. Law enforcement agencies must avoid using excessive force, unreasonable restrictions, or unlawful arrests. Conclusion: In conclusion, section 70(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada empowers courts to make orders that regulate public assemblies. This section requires a delicate balance between individual freedom and public safety, and strategic considerations and strategies must be employed to ensure that any orders made under it are fair and reasonable. Collaborative engagement, proactive preparation, the use of technology, and respect for individual rights are all strategies that could be employed to manage public assemblies while safeguarding the public's well-being.