section 80

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

Section 80 outlines the penalty for failing to perform a legal duty that results in an explosion causing death or harm to a person or property.

SECTION WORDING

80. Every one who, being under a legal duty within the meaning of section 79, fails without lawful excuse to perform that duty, is guilty of an indictable offence and, if as a result an explosion of an explosive substance occurs that (a) causes death or is likely to cause death to any person, is liable to imprisonment for life; or (b) causes bodily harm or damage to property or is likely to cause bodily harm or damage to property, is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

EXPLANATION

Section 80 of the Criminal Code of Canada pertains to the legal duty of individuals in preventing occurrences that can result in explosions of explosive substances. This section defines a legal duty as any obligation set out by law, contract, or a position of responsibility that an individual holds. This can include responsibilities such as ensuring safety measures are in place when working with explosive materials and ensuring that storage facilities comply with all relevant regulations. The section imposes a legal duty on individuals to ensure that they take all necessary steps to prevent explosions from happening. Failure to fulfill this legal duty without a lawful excuse is considered an indictable offense. If an explosion occurs as a result of this failure, the individual is liable to imprisonment for life if the explosion causes death or has the potential to cause death. In cases where the explosion causes bodily harm or damage to property or has the potential to cause such harm or damage, the individual is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. This section makes it clear that individuals who hold positions of responsibility or work with explosive materials must prioritize safety and take all measures to prevent any harm that can arise. It highlights the seriousness of not fulfilling a legal duty, particularly if the consequences of such failure result in bodily harm, property damage, or death. Therefore, all individuals must take their legal duties seriously and ensure they fulfill them to prevent any potential harm that can arise.

COMMENTARY

Section 80 of the Criminal Code of Canada establishes an important legal duty for individuals to ensure public safety. This section enforces accountability on individuals, whether they are employees, employers, contractors, or anyone who has assumed a legal duty to society. It also provides for severe punishments for those who fail to follow their legal duty that result in an explosion. An explosive substance by nature is dangerous and can cause significant injuries, even death, and damage to property. Therefore, a legal duty is imposed on individuals to ensure the safe handling and transportation of explosive substances. This legal duty acts as a safeguard to prevent accidents and improve overall public safety. Section 80 creates two different offences for individuals who fail to perform their legal duty, with varying ranges of imprisonment depending on the consequences of their actions. If an explosion occurs that causes death or is likely to cause death, the individual is liable to imprisonment for life. If an explosion that causes bodily harm or damage to property or is likely to cause bodily harm or damage to property occurs, then the individual is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. The range and severity of punishment assigned by this section demonstrate that Canadian law takes public safety very seriously. The law recognizes that failure to perform a legal duty has grave consequences, especially in the context of an explosive substance. Moreover, the punishing clause of this law does not only hold individuals accountable but is also a deterrent for others to fulfill their legal duty. These punishments are meant to denounce unfit practices and reinforce the importance of the legal obligation to carry out a safe operation. Moreover, the inclusion of the phrase "lawful excuse" allows the courts to consider extenuating circumstances and determine whether or not the person had a justification for their failure to contribute to public safety. This inclusion makes Section 80 equitable. It acknowledges that some extenuating circumstances, such as uncontrollable events and emergencies, may hinder the fulfillment of the legal duty. Thus, the inclusion of lawful excuse provides the court with the power to determine whether or not an individual intentionally did not fulfill his or her legal obligation. Overall, Section 80 of the Criminal Code is a significant development for public safety in Canada. It establishes accountability for individuals who have assumed a legal duty to society and reinforces the critical nature of prioritizing public safety. The punishment for failure to fulfill the legal obligation promotes deterrence and denounces unfit practices. The law's flexibility to consider lawful excuses provides fairness and an opportunity to recognize legitimate extenuating circumstances. Therefore, given the complexity of an explosive substance, Section 80 is a necessary law in Canada, and it ensures that people assume their legal responsibilities with care and seriousness.

STRATEGY

Section 80 of the Criminal Code of Canada is a serious provision that criminalizes the failure to perform a legal duty that results in an explosion of an explosive substance causing death or bodily harm. This section has wide-ranging implications, and its interpretation and application have significant strategic considerations for defense attorneys and prosecutors. When dealing with Section 80, one of the primary strategic considerations is to determine whether the accused was under a legal duty as defined under Section 79. Legal duty refers to any duty or obligation that a person owes to others by law, contract, or moral obligation. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the specific circumstances in question and the legal duty that the accused was under. The second strategic consideration is to determine whether the accused failed to perform that duty. Depending on the situation, failures to perform legal duties can occur in numerous ways, such as neglect, omission, or deception. Therefore, it is vital to assess the evidence to prove or disprove the accused's failure to perform the legal duty in question. A crucial strategic consideration is to analyze the nature of the explosion. The section is clear that an explosion resulting from the failure to perform a legal duty must cause death or bodily harm or damage to property. Therefore, it is essential to examine the extent of the damage caused by the explosion and whether it is enough to meet the legal threshold required by Section 80. Another critical factor to consider is the availability of lawful excuse. The accused may avoid conviction if they can prove that they had a lawful excuse for failing to perform their legal duty. For instance, if the accused was prevented from performing their legal duty due to circumstances beyond their control, such as a natural disaster or accident, they may avoid liability under Section 80. Strategies that defense attorneys and prosecutors could employ when dealing with Section 80 include conducting meticulous investigations and gathering evidence to prove or disprove the accused's failure to perform their legal duty. They may also evaluate the credibility of witnesses and the forensic evidence carefully. Moreover, both parties must consider plea bargaining. Given the significant implications of Section 80, including possible life imprisonment, plea bargaining could be an effective strategy to negotiate a plea deal. Plea bargaining can allow those accused to plead guilty to a lesser charge and avoid the risk of a more severe sentence. In conclusion, when dealing with Section 80 of the Criminal Code of Canada, lawyers must analyze the specific circumstances in question, the legal duty that the accused was under, and the extent of the damage caused by the explosion resulting from the failure to perform the legal duty. Conducting a meticulous investigation, evaluating plea bargaining options, and gathering sufficient evidence can be effective strategies for both the defense attorneys and prosecutors.

CATEGORIES