section 462.42(5)


This section outlines the procedure for appealing an order under subsection (4) of Section 462.42, with the same provisions as appeals under Part XXI of the Criminal Code.


462.42(5) An applicant or the Attorney General may appeal to the court of appeal from an order under subsection (4) and the provisions of Part XXI with respect to procedure on appeals apply, with such modifications as the circumstances require, to appeals under this subsection.


Section 462.42(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada relates to the right of an applicant or the Attorney General to appeal an order made under subsection (4). In Canada, subsection (4) of this section provides for the forfeiture of property that is connected to certain criminal offenses, such as drug offenses, fraud, and organized crime. If a court makes an order for the forfeiture of property under subsection (4), this means that the government may take possession of the property and sell it. This can be a significant loss for the owner of the property, who may have acquired it lawfully or without knowledge of any criminal activity. The ability to appeal these forfeiture orders under subsection (5) is an important safeguard for those who may have had their property seized unfairly or without justification. It allows them or the Attorney General to challenge the order in a higher court, such as the court of appeal. In accordance with subsection (5), the rules and procedures for appeals set out in Part XXI of the Criminal Code apply to appeals made under this section, with modifications as required by the circumstances. This means that the normal rules for appeals must be followed, such as filing an appropriate notice of appeal, presenting arguments and evidence, and adhering to timelines and other procedural requirements. The purpose of this section is to ensure that individuals are not unfairly deprived of their property through forfeiture orders made without adequate justification or due process. By providing for an appeal process, the Criminal Code of Canada seeks to balance the interests of the state in combatting criminal activity with the rights of individuals to protect their lawful property.


Section 462.42(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada pertains to the right to appeal an order made under subsection (4) relating to the restraint of property believed to be proceeds of crime. The section allows either the applicant or the Attorney General to appeal to the court of appeal, and the relevant procedural rules with respect to appeals outlined in Part XXI of the code apply. This section is significant because it provides a mechanism for challenging restraint orders in cases where the property in question is believed to be proceeds of crime. Under subsection (4) of section 462.42, a judge or justice of the peace may make an order directing that property be restrained, where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the property is an instrument or proceeds of crime. This order can have significant consequences for the property owner, as it may impact their ability to use or dispose of the property. By allowing for appeals of restraint orders under subsection (4), section 462.42(5) helps to ensure that property owners have a recourse in cases where the order is believed to be unjust or contrary to the law. It also provides an additional layer of oversight to the restraint order process, which is important given the potential impact of such orders on individual rights and property rights. The provision also makes clear that the procedural rules for appeals outlined in Part XXI of the code apply to appeals under this subsection, with any necessary modifications. This means that the parties to the appeal will have a clear understanding of the relevant procedural requirements, and that the appeal will be subject to the same high standards of procedural fairness as other criminal appeals. Overall, section 462.42(5) is an important provision for ensuring that the restraint of property believed to be proceeds of crime is done in a fair and just manner. By providing for the right to appeal restraint orders under subsection (4), the provision helps to protect individual rights and property rights, while also ensuring that law enforcement agencies have the tools they need to combat criminal activity.


When dealing with section 462.42(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada, which concerns appeals from orders made under subsection (4), there are several strategic considerations that must be taken into account. These considerations center on the goal of achieving a successful appeal and the factors that can influence the outcome of the case. One of the key strategic considerations is the strength of the initial appeal. It is essential to analyze the underlying legal issues and arguments that support the appeal in order to determine the strength of the case. This will require a careful review of the evidence, the law, and any previous court decisions on similar matters. Another important strategic consideration is the timing of the appeal. Appeals must be filed within a specified period, and failure to meet these deadlines can result in the appeal being dismissed. Therefore, it is important to consult with legal counsel promptly to ensure that the appeal is filed in a timely fashion. Another strategic consideration is the selection of legal counsel. The success of an appeal can depend heavily on the quality of representation, and it is important to select counsel with the appropriate skills and experience to handle the case effectively. This may involve research into the counsel's track record and reputation in handling similar cases. Additionally, it may be beneficial to assess the potential risks and benefits associated with the appeal. This can involve a careful consideration of the potential costs and resources required, as well as the likelihood of success and the potential impact on future litigation. In terms of strategies that could be employed, one approach may be to focus on the legal arguments and precedents that support the appeal. This may involve highlighting inconsistencies in previous court decisions, or arguing that the lower court made errors in its interpretation of the law or evidence. Another strategy may be to engage in negotiations or settlement discussions with the opposing party. This can be particularly beneficial if there is a possibility of reaching a mutually satisfactory resolution that avoids the need for further litigation. Overall, the key to success in dealing with section 462.42(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada is to approach the matter with careful strategic planning and execution, taking into account the legal, procedural, and practical considerations involved in the appeal process.