section 810.2(2)

INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF DESCRIPTION

A provincial court judge may summon parties to appear based on received information.

SECTION WORDING

810.2(2) A provincial court judge who receives an information under subsection (1) may cause the parties to appear before a provincial court judge.

EXPLANATION

Section 810.2(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada refers to the role of a provincial court judge when receiving information under subsection (1). This section outlines the power of a provincial court judge to summon parties and hold a hearing when given information that someone may pose a risk of committing a serious personal injury offence. The information referred to in subsection (1) must be provided by a peace officer or attorney general and must include reasonable grounds to believe that an individual may cause harm to another person. The judge may then cause the parties to appear before them to hear and evaluate evidence and determine whether the accused should be subject to specific conditions that would help prevent the commission of an offense. The judge has the authority to impose conditions such as not contacting the alleged victim, staying away from certain areas, and abstaining from drugs or alcohol. These measures are preventative in nature and aim to disrupt the potential for harm before it occurs. This is known as a peace bond or recognizance order, and is an important tool in managing and mitigating risks posed by individuals who have exhibited concerning behaviors. In summary, Section 810.2(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada allows judges to intervene in situations where there is a concern that a person may commit a serious personal injury offence. The judge's role is to assess the information provided, hear from the parties involved, and determine if specific conditions should be placed on the individual to prevent the commission of an offence. This legislation is a crucial aspect of keeping communities safe and plays an important role in the criminal justice system.

COMMENTARY

Section 810.2(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an important legal provision that allows for intervention by provincial court judges in situations where there is a risk of harm or violence to individuals. The provision enables a person who fears that they may become a victim of violence or harm from another person to provide information to a provincial court judge. The judge can then summon the parties involved in the matter before him or her for a hearing. The provision has a twofold objective: to protect potential victims from harm, and also to prevent potential perpetrators from engaging in acts of violence. By summoning both parties, the judge can evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether there is a serious threat of violence or harm. If the judge finds that there is a serious threat, he or she can impose conditions on the accused through a recognizance under section 810.1. This provision allows the judge to impose conditions against the accused that will minimize harm or violence against the potential victim. These conditions can include ordering the accused to stay away from the potential victim, refraining from any contact with them and/or attending a rehabilitation program to help them manage their behaviour. The recognizance is a legal agreement between the accused and the judge. The accused must agree to abide by the conditions set by the judge; otherwise, they can be held in custody pending a trial. The accused must also provide an assurance of their appearance in court when required. Failure to comply with the conditions of the recognizance can result in criminal charges against the accused. This provision in the Criminal Code can be particularly helpful in situations where there is a risk of domestic violence. Domestic violence is a pernicious problem in Canadian society, typically occurring between intimate partners, both married and unmarried. It can take many forms, including physical, emotional and economic abuse. According to statistics, domestic violence is the most common form of violence experienced by women and is largely under-reported. The section 810.2 (2) provision of the Criminal Code of Canada empowers victims of domestic violence to take action before physical harm or violence occurs. It provides a legal mechanism where a potential victim can be protected in advance, without having to wait for an actual act of violence to occur. This is important because, in many cases, victims are reluctant to report abuse, for fear of retribution from their partners. Such fears can be exacerbated when victims know that their partners have a history of violence or possess weapons. In summary, section 810.2 (2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a vital legal provision that provides possible victims of violence or harm with an option, whereby they can take action to protect themselves before actual harm or violence occurs. It enables provincial court judges to intervene and impose conditions against accused persons who pose a serious threat to potential victims. It is especially useful in addressing the issue of domestic violence in Canada. Overall, this provision goes a long way in empowering potential victims and making Canadian society safer for everyone.

STRATEGY

Section 810.2(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that allows a victim or a concerned party to apply for a peace bond to protect themselves from a potential offender. This section of the code gives a judge the power to order an accused individual to enter into a peace bond. This bond serves as an agreement between the accused and the court that requires the offender to refrain from certain behaviors or actions that may cause harm to the victim or other parties. If the accused violates the peace bond, they could face criminal charges, and the victim may be granted additional protection. Strategic considerations that one should keep in mind when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code of Canada include the strength of the evidence against the offender, the level of risk to the victim or other parties, and the potential for negative consequences for the accused. Additionally, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of pursuing this section of the code, such as the impact on the offender's employment, reputation, and relationships. One strategy that could be employed when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code of Canada is to gather strong evidence to support the case. Providing the court with evidence of the offender's violent or threatening behavior, such as police reports or witness statements, can strengthen the case and increase the likelihood of the court granting the peace bond. Additionally, gathering medical reports or other evidence of physical harm or psychological distress can also support the case for a peace bond. Another strategy that could be employed is to consider alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or restorative justice. These approaches may be more appropriate in situations where there is a history of conflict or where the offender is willing to take responsibility for their actions. By seeking alternative approaches, the victim may be able to avoid the negative consequences that can arise from going through the court system. Lastly, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of pursuing this section of the Criminal Code of Canada. Although the peace bond can provide the victim with protection, it may also have negative consequences for the offender, such as the impact on employment or relationships. One possible strategy is to negotiate with the offender to agree to specific conditions without the need for a peace bond. This approach could provide the desired protection for the victim, while avoiding the negative consequences for the offender. In conclusion, Section 810.2(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides a powerful tool for victims and concerned parties to seek protection from potential offenders. However, to effectively employ this section, one needs to consider several strategic considerations and be mindful of the potential consequences of pursuing this approach. By gathering strong evidence, considering alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and negotiating conditions that can provide adequate protection, one can make the best use of this section of the code.