section 160(2)


This section criminalizes compelling someone to engage in bestiality and provides for imprisonment up to 10 years.


160(2) Every person who compels another to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.


Section 160(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada addresses the criminalization of the act of compelling someone else to commit bestiality. Bestiality refers to any sexual contact between humans and animals. Under this section of the Criminal Code, any person who compels or forces another individual to engage in bestiality is committing a serious criminal offence that can result in imprisonment. This section recognizes the inherently exploitative and abusive nature of such coercion and seeks to protect individuals who may be vulnerable to such pressure. The potential penalties for violating this provision of the Criminal Code can be severe, with a maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment. This indicates the seriousness with which Canadian law views the crime of forcing someone else to engage in bestiality. In keeping with the broader aims of the Criminal Code, section 160(2) emphasizes the importance of individual autonomy and agency in matters of sexual activity. It also serves as an important tool for law enforcement officials in their efforts to protect vulnerable individuals from sexual exploitation and abuse. Ultimately, section 160(2) is an important component of Canadian criminal law that seeks to prevent and punish the violation of an individual's sexual autonomy and protect them from the harmful effects of sexual coercion and exploitation.


Section 160(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that criminalizes the act of compelling another person to commit bestiality. The provision considers that the practice of bestiality is abhorrent and should not be encouraged or condoned, even if it is done consensually. As a result, the law imposes criminal punishment for those who use force, threats, or any other means to compel or coerce another into engaging in such conduct. The term bestiality" refers to sexual activity between an animal and a human. This practice is widely regarded as immoral and unethical, and it is prohibited in most countries. The Criminal Code of Canada takes a strong stance against bestiality and punishes not only those who engage in this conduct but also those who facilitate or compel others to do so. Section 160(2) of the Code stipulates that any person who compels another to commit bestiality is guilty of an indictable offense and may be sentenced to a term of up to ten years in prison. This punishment acknowledges the seriousness of the offense and serves to deter others from engaging in such conduct. It also acknowledges the extreme vulnerability of animals, who cannot consent to sexual activity or protect themselves against human abusers. The provision also makes it an offense punishable on summary conviction, which is a less severe punishment than an indictable offense. Summary conviction allows for a lower-level offense that can be processed more quickly, allowing for more efficient and effective prosecution of those who commit this offense. However, this does not detract from the severity of the crime and the harm it inflicts on animals and society as a whole. While some critics argue that the punishment for bestiality should be even harsher, others believe that the law should not be enforced at all. They argue that animals are not human beings, and therefore laws that criminalize bestiality are an infringement on human freedom. However, this argument is flawed, as it ignores the fact that animals are living, sentient beings that deserve protection from needless harm and cruelty. In conclusion, Section 160(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an essential piece of legislation that protects animals from sexual exploitation and abuse. The provision recognizes the harm that bestiality can inflict on animals and the need to deter people from engaging in this conduct. The punishment for this offense reflects the severity of the crime and sends a clear message that such conduct will not be tolerated in Canadian society. Ultimately, the law aims to promote respect for all creatures and ensure that animals are not treated as objects for human gratification.


Section 160(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada deals with bestiality, which is a form of sexual activity involving an animal. The section criminalizes compelling another person to engage in bestiality and is punishable by imprisonment. When dealing with this section of the Criminal Code of Canada, there are several strategic considerations that should be taken into account. First, it is important to understand the definition of bestiality as outlined in the Criminal Code of Canada. According to the law, bestiality involves any sexual activity between a human and an animal. This includes not only penetration, but also any other form of sexual contact, such as oral sex or manual stimulation. It is essential to be aware of this definition and its implications when dealing with cases related to bestiality. Second, it is crucial to understand the types of evidence that may be used in a case pertaining to bestiality. Since bestiality often occurs in private settings, there may be limited evidence available. This can make it difficult to prove the offence beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, investigators must be strategic in collecting and preserving evidence, and prosecutors should carefully assess all available evidence before proceeding with charges. Third, it is important to keep in mind the sensitivity of the offence when dealing with cases related to bestiality. The nature of this crime can evoke strong emotions from victims, witnesses, and the public. A prosecutor should be aware of this when presenting a case in court, and must take measures to handle the situation with sensitivity and respect. In terms of strategies that could be employed, the first step would be to gather evidence. Investigators should try to obtain as much evidence as possible, including statements from witnesses, medical reports, and any physical evidence that may be relevant to the case. This evidence should be collected and preserved in such a way that it will be admissible in court. Once evidence has been collected, a prosecutor should consider the strengths and weaknesses of the case before proceeding with charges. This includes assessing the credibility of witnesses and the availability of evidence. If it is determined that the case is not strong enough to proceed with charges, a prosecutor may consider other options, such as mediation or diversion programs. If charges are pursued, a prosecutor should be prepared to present the case in a clear and concise manner, taking into consideration the sensitivity of the offence. Witnesses should be prepared to testify, and any supporting evidence should be presented in a way that is easily understood by the court. In conclusion, when dealing with Section 160(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada, it is important to be aware of the definition of bestiality, the types of evidence that may be used, and the sensitivity of the offence. A prosecutor should carefully assess all available evidence before proceeding with charges, and should be prepared to present the case in a clear and sensitive manner. By employing these strategies, a prosecutor can achieve the best possible outcome for the victim and ensure that justice is served.