section 197(1)


The definition of public place in this section includes any place accessible to the public by invitation or right.


197(1) In this Part, "public place" includes any place to which the public have access as of right or by invitation, express or implied.


Section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a definition clause that is primarily concerned with identifying what constitutes a "public place" within the context of the Code. The section establishes the parameters within which certain offences, such as those related to public morality, can occur. According to the section, a public place refers to any location that is accessible to the general public either as of right or through an invitation. This includes buildings, streets, parks, malls, and other areas that are open to the public. The definition of a public place is significant because it helps to clarify when certain criminal offences can occur. For example, section 173(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada prohibits indecent acts in public places. By defining what constitutes a public place, section 197(1) helps the courts to interpret the scope of section 173(1) and similar provisions in the Criminal Code. A public place must be distinguished from a private place, such as a person's home or a private office. Acts prohibited under the Criminal Code, such as indecent acts or acts of violence, that occur within private places are governed by different legislation. In summary, section 197(1) establishes the definition of a public place within the Criminal Code of Canada. This definition is essential in clarifying the scope of various criminal offences and helps to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions in locations accessible to the public. The section enables the courts to interpret these provisions relating to public morality and enforce them effectively.


Section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an essential part of the Canadian law system, as it defines the term public place" in regards to other laws that use the term. The definition provided is broad and inclusive, covering any place to which the public has access as of right or by invitation, express or implied". This ensures that when the law refers to a public place", it encompasses a wide variety of locations where the public may be present. The definition provided in this section is significant because it has legal implications in several criminal offenses, such as disorderly conduct, public mischief, and trespassing. For instance, the Criminal Code of Canada considers behaviour that causes a disturbance in a public place as disorderly conduct. This means that the behavior must occur in a location that falls under the definition of a public place to be considered an offense. Thus, Section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada's definition ensures that the law remains applicable to a vast array of locations where disorderly conduct may occur. Furthermore, the section's definition is crucial in understanding the concept of implied invitation" in Canadian law. If a location is open to the public, even if it is not explicitly stated, the public has an implied invitation to access it. This means that the law will treat the location the same way it treats explicit invitations. An example of this would be a shopping mall, which is a location that is generally open to the public and allows people to enter without the need for an explicit invitation. Therefore the mall becomes a public place as per section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Another application of Section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada is in the protection of privacy rights of individuals. In various Canadian legal statutes, people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes or private spaces. Conversely, public spaces are areas where individuals have a reduced expectation of privacy. Thus, the ability of the public to access a location plays a significant role in determining whether it is public or private. The broad definition of public space provided by this section ensures that the law can effectively police public spaces and maintain public safety. For example, public places such as parks, beaches, and streets are subject to police intervention if there are significant concerns such as illegal activity, public disturbances, or disorderly conduct. This represents the delicate balance between individual rights and public safety in Canadian law, where public spaces are treated as shared areas that require an equal balance of protection and policing. In conclusion, Section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada's broad and inclusive definition of public space is essential to the Canadian legal system, as it provides a flexible and comprehensive definition of public spaces applicable to several areas of the law, including criminal offenses and privacy laws. Its reach also ensures that individuals can have an expectation of privacy in their personal spaces, while public spaces remain open for public use and access. This demonstrates how Canadian law emphasizes the balance between individual liberty and safety, allowing for the proper functioning of a democratic society.


Section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines public place" as any location that is accessible to the public by invitation or right. This section is essential in criminal law, as many offences such as public intoxication, disorderly conduct, and indecent exposure happen in public places. Therefore, it is vital to understand the strategic considerations when dealing with this section. Firstly, any legal practitioner should understand the scope of the term public place" as defined by this section. The definition is broad and includes any location accessible to the public, whether by invitation or by law. Any location, whether indoors or outdoors, that is not a private space, can be deemed a public place. For example, a train station or a park can be a public place. Additionally, a privately-owned place can be considered a public place if the owner allows the public to access it. Secondly, the legal practitioner should assess the application of the section to the particular offence. In some instances, an offence that occurs in a public place might not qualify as a public order offence. Hence, the legal representative should analyze whether the offence occurs in a qualifying public area to establish the charge's appropriate categorization. Further, the legal practitioner should consider strategies that could be employed within the bounds of the Criminal Code of Canada. One such strategy could be seeking a plea to a lesser sentence under section 730 of the Criminal Code of Canada. If the sentencing court determines that the offender has reasonable prospects for rehabilitation, they can sentence the offender to a conditional discharge or probation instead of a jail term. This strategy can be useful where the public place offence is a minor one and where the offender has little or no prior criminal record. Another strategy could be to negotiate with the Crown Prosecutor and seek an alternative to a public spectacle such as community service, fines, or restitution. This strategy can be useful in cases where the offender has admitted to the offence(s) and shows signs of remorse. In conclusion, legal practitioners dealing with offences involving public places must understand the scope of section 197(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The legal practitioner should carefully evaluate the application of the section to the offence and develop strategies within the ambit of the law to mitigate the consequences of the offence. Employing such strategies can go a long way in securing a better outcome for the offender.