section 335(2)


The definition of vessel in section 214 applies to subsection (1) of section 335.


335(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), "vessel" has the meaning assigned by section 214.


Section 335(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada clarifies the meaning of the term "vessel" for the purposes of subsection (1). This subsection criminalizes the tampering or interfering with the operation or safety of a vessel, which includes boats, ships, and other watercraft. The penalty for such offenses can be severe, ranging from fines to imprisonment. The term "vessel" used in subsection (1) is given meaning by section 214 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Section 214 defines "vessel" as any watercraft used or capable of being used as a means of transportation on water, other than aircraft that can be used on water. This definition includes not only large commercial vessels but also smaller recreational boats and other floating platforms. The importance of this definition lies in the fact that it helps to clarify the scope of the offense of tampering or interfering with the operation or safety of a vessel. Without a clear definition of what constitutes a "vessel," it would be difficult to enforce this offense and prosecute those who violate it. In summary, section 335(2) serves to provide clarity and definition to the term "vessel" as it is used in subsection (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This helps to ensure that individuals who tamper with or interfere with the operation or safety of any watercraft can be held accountable for their actions under the criminal law.


Section 335(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that outlines the definition of vessel" for the purpose of subsection (1). This provision plays a crucial role in the Canadian criminal justice system, as it is essential for the prosecution of certain crimes, such as theft and mischief involving watercraft. The definition of vessel" is fundamental in understanding the scope of this section and its implications. According to section 214, a vessel is any kind of watercraft, including boats, ships, hovercraft, or even seaplanes that can be used as a means of transportation on water. The wide-ranging definition of vessel" reflects the diverse types of watercraft that exist. This definition also applies to section 335(1), which prohibits the theft or mischief of a vessel. Section 335(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada states that any person who commits theft or mischief concerning a vessel is guilty of an offense and liable to imprisonment for up to ten years if the value of the vessel exceeds $5,000. If the vessel's value is less than $5,000, the maximum penalty is two years in prison. Therefore, Section 335 provides a legal framework to protect boat and ship owners from theft or damage perpetrated by malicious individuals. The reason that the definition of vessel" is so essential to this provision is that the offenses outlined in Section 335 can only be applied to watercraft. Any type of theft or mischief involving property that is not a vessel should be prosecuted under a different section of the Criminal Code of Canada. For example, if someone steals or damages a bicycle, car, or building, it should not be dealt with under Section 335. Furthermore, it is worth noting that Section 335 does not differentiate between commercial and private vessels. Whether the vessel is a luxury yacht or a fishing boat, theft or mischief is considered an offense. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that all laws protect and apply to all types of boat owners, regardless of their occupation or reasons for owning a vessel. In conclusion, Section 335(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that defines vessel" and its significance in Section 335 (1). It plays an important role in the Canadian criminal justice system as it sets out the legal framework to protect watercraft owners from the theft or mischief of their vessels. While theft or mischief involving other types of property is covered in other sections of the Criminal Code, section 335 provides specific protection to individuals who own watercraft. This section of the Criminal Code ensures that boat owners are not subject to theft or damage to their vessels without legal consequences.


Section 335(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines the term "vessel" as it pertains to subsection (1). The section is part of the provisions that deal with theft, fraud, and mischief, and outlines the various classes of property that can be subject to these offences. Vessels, in this context, refer to boats and other watercraft. For those involved in criminal law, dealing with section 335(2) requires a number of strategic considerations and potential strategies. One of the most significant strategic considerations when dealing with section 335(2) is the nature of the crime at issue. If a boat or other watercraft is alleged to have been stolen or damaged, the criminal defense lawyer may need to consider whether the accused was responsible for the damage or theft. If they were not, then they will need to develop a defense to prove their innocence. Another important strategic consideration is the location where the alleged criminal activity took place. For example, if the boat in question is a commercial vessel, then the defense lawyer may want to focus on whether the owner was following regulations and laws surrounding commercial shipping. They may also need to examine evidence surrounding the alleged damage or theft to figure out jurisdictional and other key details. A third strategic consideration pertains to potential motives for the criminal activity. Defense lawyers may want to investigate the accused's financial situation, possible insurance claims, or the circumstances surrounding the alleged theft of the vessel. Identifying potential motives can help build a defense that weakens the prosecution's case. There are several strategies that a defense lawyer could employ when dealing with section 335(2). One of these is to request a preliminary hearing to determine whether the prosecution has sufficient evidence to proceed with a full trial. This strategy can help save time and resources, as well as allow the defense to assess the government's case before the trial begins. Another strategy may involve identifying potential weaknesses in the prosecution's case and focusing on them during trial. For example, the defense may want to highlight inconsistencies or holes in the government's evidence that casts doubt on their case. They may do this by cross-examining witnesses, bringing in expert witnesses of their own, and analyzing physical evidence. Finally, a defense lawyer may also consider negotiating a plea deal, if appropriate. This strategy can involve working with the prosecution to reduce the charges and penalties faced by the accused in exchange for a guilty plea. Negotiating a plea deal can be advantageous in certain situations, such as when the evidence against the accused is particularly strong. In conclusion, section 335(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a key legal provision for those involved in criminal law, particularly for those dealing with theft, fraud, and mischief cases involving watercraft. Strategic considerations and possible strategies for defense lawyers include a careful examination of the alleged crime and location, finding evidence of motive or intention, negotiations with the prosecution, and highlighting holes in the government's case to build a strong defense. By using these strategies effectively, lawyers can help reduce the penalties clients face and, in some cases, secure full acquittal.